Instead of entering the "economic advantage" of training in the focus,
it should be discussed how young people can develop skills that lead
to the production of a democratic society
After the formation petition will now be discussed in Parliament, the
question arises: What can a petition to bring training, which cries
out because of economic constraints, the need to reform the training
system (Austria must remain seated)?
Of course, one could talk with this justification of a strategic
finesse - after all, in this political era can not wring as much as
the economic constraints, the policy an act. However, the reverse
would also be permitted, namely, that might have been the use of the
trainingal concept of a finesse to gain a broad class of society for
economic cost measures.
Because of this for some reason always made connection between
training and economic constraints, discuss I want, what it means to
optimize the design of the trainingal system for the purpose of
economic benefits - and how these issues could be the reason for a
seemingly permanent crisis in training.
Training per se is an inefficient process and time intenisver
Training, especially in the sense that it is in the best speeches to
some stylized, whose support no one wants to reject openly contradict
the basic laws of the globalized capitalist economy: it is inherently
extremely inefficient, it costs so much time in the immediately no
Value is created, which could be bought by money, they are not able
directly to goods or services to provide, she takes the forming men
for the duration of a high Konsumierfähigkeit, their effects are
ineffective, by interrupting inquiring, reflective practices,
motivation or at least distract them and possibly restrict the
Konsumierfreudigkeit.
It is therefore an illusion that the current capitalist economy would
need well educated people. It needs well-trained "uninterrupted
working" people. And exactly in this direction, namely the formation
of functional people will develop an training system that is for the
purpose of optimizing an economic advantage of location made.
Training is a necessity for democracy
However, there is a reason why training is the way it negotiates in
the best speeches, no one can openly reject. For it is in some sense a
need for a democratic society. Opens to all people the possibility of
a provision only be regarded as legitimate if the majority of
stakeholders agree with this provision. For this purpose, namely, both
the imagination necessary to understand and anticipate this provision,
as well as the ability to formulate appropriate alternatives in the
same room as these are heard. These are two assets, which are almost
exclusively funded through trainingal processes that are not
interested in a direct applicability of their contents.
The keynote of which differ not the parliamentary discussion on the
training referendum would, if it were actually about training as a
qualification to a democratic society would be the following:
(developed together with the possibility of this ability) The ability
to produce a democratic society, must have the economic benefit of
this society are raised. This is the most important step is to enable
all young people in fact, develop such skills in the trainingal
institutions that are necessary for everyday life, creation of
democratic conditions. A step that requires not just merely a reform
of trainingal institutions, but especially and first of all, the
situation of young people should take into consideration, because this
determines how the options provided can be actually used.
Wants to see to what extent Austria allow a younger generation the
daily construction of democracy and support them - which could mean
that the upcoming parliamentary debate so at best, would be a space by
these circumstances and tensions can be negotiated with care.
